patrickgalexander

The IB’s Digital Blueprint: A Model for Ecosystem-Based Learning?

The International Baccalaureate’s new digital blueprint offers a compelling vision for how educational organizations can navigate the AI revolution, not through top-down control, but through ecosystem orchestration. This approach has profound implications for rethinking schooling beyond traditional institutional boundaries. The IB’s fundamental insight is recognizing that technology cannot be bolted onto existing systems. Serving 5,800 schools and 2 million students, they’ve acknowledged that “incremental improvements are likely to be insufficient.” Instead, they’re pioneering three transformative commitments that could reshape educational models globally.

Systems thinking positions the IB not as a content provider but as an ecosystem architect. By building shared libraries, creating integration points, and considering ripple effects across their network, they’re demonstrating how educational organizations can move from isolated silos to interconnected learning communities. This mirrors the OECD’s call for learning ecosystems that balance formal and non-formal education, discussed in the last post.

Partnerships represent a radical departure from the closed, proprietary model that has dominated education technology and school organisations. Offering APIs, shared recognition processes, and a marketplace for IB-aligned tools, they’re creating the potential conditions for innovation at scale. This acknowledges what individual schools cannot achieve alone: access to cutting-edge EdTech tailored to pedagogical principles rather than market whims. Mindful innovation addresses technology’s double-edged nature. Rather than either rejecting or uncritically embracing AI, the IB commits to “deliberate adoption”—providing guidance, running structured experiments, and insisting that “human connection” remains foundational. This balances the OECD framework’s emphasis on understanding technology critically with practical implementation.

Perhaps most exciting are the implications for alternative learning models. This digital ecosystem approach could empower small education hubs, homeschooling cooperatives, independent study centres, and spaces like MAC where students learn outside traditional school structures. Students studying independently or in small groups could access the same high-quality resources, assessment tools, and global networks as those in established schools, while maintaining the flexibility, personalization, and human-scale relationships that make alternative educational models so powerful. This democratisation of educational infrastructure could finally bridge the gap between institutional quality and individualised learning. As always, however, the proof will be in the pudding: educational transformation happens through emergence as much as intention, and it remains to be seen if the IBO will follow through on the promise of an approach that enables rather than controls, and connects rather than contains.

Rethinking Schooling for Human Flourishing: Beyond the Human Capital Model

Let’s start 2026 on a positive note. The OECD’s “Education for Human Flourishing” framework challenges us to fundamentally reimagine what schools are for. For decades, education systems have operated under the Human Capital model, preparing students for jobs through cognitive examinations. But as PISA results flatline and youth mental health crises deepen, it’s clear this approach is inadequate for tomorrow’s world.

While the OECD isn’t necessarily our go-to for radical thinking about education, this framework offers some really productive points of provocation for those of use in the business of re-imagining education. The framework proposes a profound shift: schools should nurture broader capabilities spanning the academic, caring, and creative. Rather than merely preparing workers, education should develop adaptive problem-solvers, ethical decision-makers, and young people who can understand, appreciate, and act meaningfully in the world. This is a key shift, and the fact that the OECD are arguing for a move away from a crude approach to ‘work readiness’ is striking.

This isn’t soft pedagogy: it’s rigorous and demanding. Students need robust foundations in mathematics, science, and reading, complemented by social-emotional skills. But they also need competencies our current systems rarely address systematically: the ability to synthesize competing worldviews, appreciate beauty and nature, reason ethically about complex dilemmas, and develop genuine agency in shaping their futures.

The implications for schools are transformative. Learning environments must balance teacher guidance with experiential discovery. Curricula should be co-designed with students, not delivered to them. Assessment must move beyond standardized tests to capture the full range of human capabilities. And crucially, schools cannot do this alone. They must orchestrate learning ecosystems involving families, communities, and diverse organisations.

Perhaps most challenging is the call for educational leaders to develop new competencies themselves: championing equity, thinking systemically, managing innovation, and fostering agency in others. Teachers need professional development in facilitating deep learning, curriculum co-design, and navigating AI’s opportunities and risks.

In our age of generative artificial intelligence, this framework offers some hope for ensuring technology amplifies rather than diminishes human potential. Grounding education in human flourishing (happiness, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment) means that we can do our best to equip the next generation not just to survive disruption, but to create thriving societies on a healthy planet.

The question isn’t whether we can afford this transformation. It’s whether we can afford not to pursue it.

The Hidden Crisis: How Anxiety is Reshaping School Attendance

A striking new survey reveals that nearly half of UK secondary students avoided school last year due to anxiety—a statistic that should serve as a wake-up call for our entire education system. With 49.5% of pupils missing classes because of anxious feelings, we’re witnessing not just an attendance crisis, but a fundamental mismatch between traditional schooling and student wellbeing.

The data paints a troubling picture: exam pressure tops the list of anxiety triggers at 27.6%, followed by fear of public speaking and worries about falling behind. Perhaps most concerning, over a third of students feel their teachers rarely or never understand their anxiety. As Minerva Virtual Academy’s Hugh Viney notes, this isn’t about teacher inadequacy—”the system is too overloaded.”

This crisis demands we reconsider what education researcher Sir Ken Robinson famously called our “industrial model” of schooling. Current research increasingly supports hybrid and flexible learning environments that accommodate diverse student needs. Studies show that blended learning models—combining in-person and online education—can reduce performance anxiety while maintaining academic rigor.

The pandemic inadvertently created a massive experiment in alternative education delivery. While persistent absence has decreased from its 2021/22 peak of 22.3% to 17.6%, it remains well above pre-pandemic levels, suggesting structural issues rather than temporary disruption.

Moving forward, schools must evolve beyond one-size-fits-all approaches. This means investing in mental health support—the government’s plan for comprehensive coverage by 2029/30 is a start—but also reimagining learning environments themselves. Hybrid models that offer flexibility, reduce social pressures, and allow students to learn at their own pace aren’t just accommodations; they’re necessities for a generation facing unprecedented mental health challenges.

The question isn’t whether schools should change, but whether we can afford to wait.

Why Education Needs a Revolution, Not an Evolution

Why we need a new way of blending online and in-person learning in a new kind of educational community

The industrial model of education is dying, and it’s taking our students’ potential with it.

For over a century, we’ve been herding young minds through factory-line classrooms, measuring success by standardised metrics that bear little resemblance to the skills they’ll actually need in life. We’ve created a system where creativity is discouraged, curiosity is scheduled into 45-minute blocks, and individual brilliance is often sacrificed on the altar of “keeping up with the curriculum.”

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: the world our students will inherit looks nothing like the world our educational system was designed for.

Today’s 16-year-olds will enter careers that don’t yet exist, solve problems we haven’t yet imagined, and navigate a global landscape that shifts faster than any textbook can capture. They need to be adaptable, creative, collaborative, and confident in uncertainty. Yet we’re still teaching them to memorise facts they can Google in seconds and to fear making mistakes instead of learning from them.

The pandemic gave us a glimpse of what’s possible when we break free from traditional constraints. Students who thrived in flexible, personalised learning environments. Educators who discovered the power of authentic connection over crowd control. Families who realised that learning happens everywhere, not just within school walls.

We can’t afford to return to business as usual. The mental health crisis among young people, the skills gap in the workplace, and the growing disconnect between education and real-world application are symptoms of a system that has outlived its purpose.

The future belongs to institutions brave enough to reimagine education from the ground up – places where students aren’t just prepared for tests, but for life itself. Where individual potential isn’t constrained by arbitrary age-based groupings or rigid timetables.

The revolution in education isn’t coming. It’s here. The only question is whether we’ll lead it or be left behind by it.

The future of learning starts with unlearning everything we thought we knew about school.